Friday, April 30, 2010
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Why do people hate Israel?
Why do people hate Israel?
1. Is it because Israeli democracy (without Arabs) is like Hitler’s democracy (without Gypsies, Jews)?
2. Is it because
3. It is based on Theocratic Zealotry i.e. “God gave us the land, our God gave us the right to purge people due to ethnicity and religion”?
4. Is it because of intolerance i.e. “you are not a Semite, my religion is superior than yours, my race is superior than yours, you are reported (reliable source says, ‘most Report Monkeys are Israelis and Israeli supporters) and last sixty years dreadful record?
5. Is it because they are victims of their own propaganda?
6. Is it because they do not have any desire to make peace with the Palestinians?
7. Is it because they do not have any peace plan to make a peace with the Palestinians?
8. Is it because their desire to maim and murder unarmed Palestinians till they day of judgment i.e. we won’t allow any army in
9. Is it because of their ultimate plan to drive Palestinians to sea?
No Report Monkeys please. Debate with intelligence and integrity.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
The NSW Taxi Drivers’ Association under Suffocation
The NSW Taxi Drivers’ Association under Suffocation
Geoff got a good point.
Ernie my information and your information are correct. However, no one will contact the reclusive and elusive three and a half committee embers of NSW TDA. Please get it right!
Ted, public are waking up. Yet, the rude, arrogant and ignorant trio of the NSWTDA Executive Committee are power drunk and full of vengeance. Bailee taxi drivers’ interests and welfare are disappearing from their agenda.
Ernie Mollenhauer is not even a NSW TDA Committee Member! He does not have a voting right too! Nonetheless, effectively, he is the Membership Manager and Treasurer of the NSW TDA. He is also Secretary of the Association as only he can write and read documents!
“Stalker” Bradley boosts himself as Minutes Secretary, Treasurer, and Secretary too. This poor fellow does not even have the capability to run a chook ruffle!
The ‘queen of the bee hive’ Anne Turner calls herself “Princess Anne”. This sad person virtually neither read nor wrote a serious document about taxi industry. She is becoming a headache for the taxi drivers’ movement.
Moderator, Free Australia Now
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
From: Coates
Subject: RE: NEW LEASES – PwC ISSUES PAPER 1MAR2010
To: "Ted Hirsch"
Received: Tuesday, 9 March, 2010, 6:15 PM
As expressed to you Price Waterhouse Coopers must consider views of people paying their fees (MoT/T&I)
A consideration to ‘Seniority Plates’ must be given. However I must agree N.S.W. TDA have NOT included on their Agenda. This conflicts with the allocation of plates to the highest bidder.
Yours sincerely,
Geoff Coates
Phone: 02 9526 1629
Fax: 02 9526 1649
From: Ernie Mollenhauer
Subject: RE: tee shirt
To: "Faruque Ahmed"
Cc: "Trevor Bradley"
Received: Tuesday, 9 March, 2010, 12:13 PM
Faruque,
I have NO knowledge of a spontaneous action at
Apropos your personal effects, if anyone does have them no one is telling me, sorry.
Ernie
From: Ted Hirsch
Subject: SMH
To: "Faruque Ahmed"
Received: Tuesday, 9 March, 2010, 9:38 AM
From Nov09 to Jan2010 SMH front pages Linton Besser had strong campaigns on NSW taxis !
In Feb 2010 SMH front pages Andrew West had strong campaigns on
On 9 March 2010 SMH front page Linton Besser has strong campaign on Federal Defence spending!
SMH LETTERS 12 Feb 2010
The how, the why
Deloitte’s $347,680 in political donations to the Liberal Party and $315,399 to the ALP since 2005 are a matter of public interest, as Wayne Goss acknowledges (Letters Feb 11). He says he has never had any involvement in how Deloitte makes its political donations. Yes, but has he any involvement in why it does so?
Anne Wagstaff Oatley
--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "Rahat"
Stalker Trevor Bradley and Mental Tony
Last night a dispute erupted between a taxi driver and a security guard over a short fare. Other taxi drivers present at the sport knew the taxi driver was correct and the badly trained, poorly paid and rude security guard was incorrect.
The situation went out of hand. All taxi drivers spontaneously went on to block the airport terminals and eventually roads nearby. It was a big commotion for a god 20 minutes. The "Blackwater Security Guards" under the guise of AFP appeared in the horizon with an intention to use F18 and tanks! Fortunately it was not
1. This is an illegal blockade,
2. To have a blockade like this you need permission (?),
3. If you do not end this blockade, we will take your picture and hand them over to the zealots of the NSW Transport and Infrastructure (and they will hang you from the
A few taxi drivers rang Faruque Ahmed for guidance. Faruque did his best. The sad part is the NSW TDA was missing in action like most of the time!
Anne Turner is an uneducated person and she neither read nor wrote a serious document about taxi industry. She used to hide behind Faruque for assistance and guidance. Lately she was captured by the taxi mafia. Naturally, under their guidance she is spewing all of her venom against Faruque with the assistance of a few including Tony and Trevor.
Tony
One must wonder, what is the mission statement of the NSW TDA? Surely it is a sad and bad situation for all taxi drivers.
In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "Biplobi Faruque"
Re: Faruque vs David
Ernie
I do not believe Anne. Several times she promised me to hand over my T-shirt, jogging shoes, and track suite. Garry's garage story does not add up for many reasons including she told me that she had removed my items from Garry's garage.
Anne is a vindictive person and her alter ego is colliding with
I also would like to know who are these people sending information about my t-shirt to media outlets?!
Thanks for trying. We all stand for judgment.
By the way do you now anything about the spontaneous blockade at the airport last night?
--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "Biplobi Faruque"
Re: Faruque vs David
I hope David will allow me to expose taxi corruption. Should he fail to do so may force me to take legal action.
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "bonmali@..."
Re: Faruque vs David
This morning David and Faruque had a pleasant discussion in the radio 2GB open line and Faruque was the winner.
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Biplobi Faruque"
Thank you David. I always said, crime and stupidity are not confined within the boundaries of race, religion and sex. Therefore; should anyone commit crime must serve the time no matter what!
Frankly speaking, I would like to talk about taxi industry and I love to expose many crimes and corruption I know about. Taxi Plate, Beyond Taxi Plate, the NSW Transport and Infrastructure's Conspiracy to Cove Up Crimes and Desperate Issues Papers are in my heart. Not some overseas issues.
Anyway, David I do have an improved understanding about you for many reasons. Yet, I won't disappoint you.
9/11 – An Active Question re Osama bin Laden and Yahoo Questions and Answers are exonerating George Bush's buddy Osama bin Laden.
Faruque Ahmed's T-Shirt is for your consideration. Please do not blame anyone for Faruque Ahmed as he is responsible for himself.
I am going to ring you tonight.
Moderator , Free Australia Now
Extracted from another email of David
Amazing piece of information - Faruque Ahmed has a T-shirt that reads, "I love Osama" and wore same to a taxi drivers' meeting - well that sure puts it all in perspective for the rest of us. I wonder if anyone is surprised - I also wonder how many of Faruque's chums have similar T-shirts?
David.
RE: 2GB Stop Inciting Against Muslims And Arabs Based on False and Fabricated Reasons and Grounds
Tuesday, 2 March, 2010 2:16 PM
From: "David Oldfield"
To: "Faruque Ahmed"
Cc:
"Keysar Trad"
Faruque - the last time you carried on with this and even wrote to the station, it was over a legitimate news story about a couple of Turkish men who allegedly murdered a young female family member and buried her under a hen house - described by Turkish authorities as an honour killing - the story was all over the news on the internet and featured in several major Australian newspapers including the Sydney Morning Herald - when conveying the story, I didn't even mention muslims - I did it as a straight story out of Turkey.
On this occasion, I gather you are noting the story from the Australian Newspaper regarding all of the terrorist suspects and/or sympathisers that are under surveillance in
While reporting and commenting on such news, may not suit your personal agenda and evident life of public denial, in this country, we are still allowed to have opinions and mine are presented in a balanced manner.
I do not speak for any other, but my programme does not prevent people from going on air unless they appear drunk - you are welcome at any time to give any view, same or opposing - the number is 131 873.
David.
From: Faruque Ahmed [mailto:union_faruque@...]
Sent: Tue 2/03/2010 2:05 AM
To: David Oldfield; Brian Wilshire; Chris Smith; Stuart Bocking; Steve Price; John Stanley; Phillip Adams; Auckland Richard
Cc: Keysar Trad; prince ablin; Shaptahik Dhaka; Samakal Dhaka; Ittefaq Dhaka; Inqilab Dhaka; Sheikh Haron; Khaled Khan; Khalid Haleem; Monitor RadioCan; Media Watch; Gunay Sever; Gulzer TDBGate
Subject: 2GB Stop Inciting Against Muslims And Arabs Based on False and Fabricated Reasons and Grounds
2GB Stop Inciting Against Muslims And Arabs Based on False and Fabricated Reasons and Grounds Further to David Oldfield, David Oldfield to David Oldfield, Taxi Mafia Inspired Blockade (Radio 2 UE), David Oldfield to Jim Ball and Taxi Mafia Inspired Blockade (adio 2GB) are self explanatory. David Oldfield and many 2GB shock jocks have been inciting against Muslims and Arabs for a long time. They do so without any valid reasons and grounds. They also do not provide a right of reply. Surprisingly in the 2GB hate-a-thon we do not hear any opposing views even a faint one. Why is it so? Is it because the gutless 2GB shock jocks hide behind telephonists and four walls? They are also scared of the Zionists. The Zionists have been using However, people like David Oldfield and his colleagues are very keen on attacking the Muslims like religious choir. May I ask you David, why do you have to incite people? Don't you remember the Cronula Riot Report? More than 123 pages of the Brad Hazard Report found 2GB was guilty of inciting that riot. Do you accept any responsibility David? This morning you are screening like race caller by using the most irrational and illogical fear and paranoia based on prejudice and bigotry. Why is it so David? I think time is right to monitor Radio 2GB as it is becoming a national security threat and a menace in the society. I hope the Australian Communications and Media Authority should take care of Moderator Tuesday, 02/03/2010 Email: union_faruque@... For More: Crimes Exposed |
Source: http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/Sydney_TaxiCorruption/message/1712
--- On Mon, 8/3/10, Ernie Mollenhauer
From: Ernie Mollenhauer
Subject: FW: tee shirt
To: "Faruque Ahmed"
Cc: "Trevor Bradley"
Received: Monday, 8 March, 2010, 3:11 PM
Faruque,
I know that that tee shirt was important to you although I personally wish that it had never existed. I hope that from this email from Trevor you will see that he TRIED to get it back for you but was too late. Sorry,
Ernie
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:59:27 -0800
From: teebrad54@...
Subject: tee shirt
To: erniethecabbie@...
Ernie, For your information, Faruque's tee shirt, and I think some shoes as well, has been chucked in the garbage skip at Garry's workshop. No one from the NSWTDA has kept the tee shirt from Faruque, nor have they had it in their possession.
I went over to Garry's workshop myself to pick up the tee shirt, where it had been left. I intended to give it to you so that it might help you in negotiations with Faruque.
It was not there. Garry told me it had been left for some months and it had been eventually chucked away.
If Faruque does not believe Anne, then he could easily go over to Garry's workshop and ask him. Garry is an independent outsider and he has no reason to lie nor would he. So if Faruque has doubts he can get the facts straight from the horse's mouth and ascertain for himself the exact truth.
You can refer to this email and pass these facts on to Faruque if it will help you in your negotiations.
Thanks for all your efforts,
Keep the Faith Trevbrad
Sources: Sydney Taxi Corruption
Friday, February 19, 2010
The Text of the Covenant of Umar I
The Text of the Covenant of Umar I
In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Beneficent. This is what the slave of Allah, Umar b.Al-Khattab, the Amir of the believers, has offered the people of Illyaa’ of security granting them Amaan (protection) for their selves, their money, their churches, their children, their lowly and their innocent, and the remainder of their people. Their churches are not to be taken, nor are they to be destroyed, nor are they to be degraded or belittled, neither are their crosses or their money, and they are not to be forced to change their religion, nor is any one of them to be harmed. No Jews are to live with them in Illyaa’ and it is required of the people of Illyaa’ to pay the Jizya, like the people of the cities. It is also required of them to remove the Romans from the land; and whoever amongst the people of Illyaa’ that wishes to depart with their selves and their money with the Romans, leaving their business and crosses behind, then their selves, their trading goods and their children are secure until they reach their destination. Upon what is in this book is the word of Allah, the covenant of His Messenger, of the Khulafaa’ and of the believers if they (the people of Illyaa’) gave what was required of them of Jizya. The witnesses upon this were Khalid ibn Al-Walid, 'Amr ibn al-'As, Abdur Rahman bin Awf and Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufyan. Written and passed on the 15th year (after Hijrah)
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Representation before the Industrial Relations Commission concerning Bailee Taxi Drivers
Representation before the Industrial Relations Commission concerning Bailee Taxi Drivers.
NSW Minister for Industrial Relations
&
NSW Attorney General
Date: 27th June 2001
Re: Representation before the Industrial Relations Commission concerning Bailee Taxi Drivers.
Dear Sir
The NSW Cabbie Welfare Association has been formed to address the basic, natural needs of cab drivers and to have their voice heard in the Taxi industry. It is this association's intention to prioritise the safety, future security and overall welfare of cab drivers and it is for these reasons many cabbies have and are becoming members of this association.
As a taxi fare increase is due for the coming financial year from July 2001, the Minister for Transport (concerning taxi fare increase) and the NSW Industrial Relations Commission (Concerning Pay-ins increase) are going to make decisions on the matter of the amount of that taxi fare increase and pay-in increase respectively. Many citizens of this state need the use of a taxi service as part of their daily routine. They are all clearly subjected to the effect of a fare increase.
We ask you to consider all the consequences before making any decision so as to ensure the proposed increase would not adversely affect the poorer sections of this state's society, such as the sick, partially infirmed, pensioners etc. all of whom are strongly dependent on and require a taxi service that is financially within their reach to do short trips, visits etc.
The matter of a taxi fare increase is of great community concern. It should be a matter for consultation well before any proposed taxi meter increase with all affected parties and stake holders being given the opportunity to have their voices and views considered to ensure that the increase is a fair and genuine increase.
We believe it is necessary for us to provide input into the current negotiations in relation to the aforementioned taxi meter increase and pay-in increase at the NSW Industrial Relations Commission.
In relation to you and your department considering our association as a party to these matters could you kindly extend to us an invitation so that we could express our viewpoint, thereby ensuring the best interests of the wider community are properly served.
We await your considered yet prompt response.
With Thanks.
Sincerely yours
Naresh Kumar
(Gen.Secretary)
Friday, October 16, 2009
Sri Lanka, Muslim and Israel
Sri Lanka, Muslim and Israel
The expulsion of the Muslims from Jaffna is confirmed by Wiki and many other independent sources. The Muslim Mosque Massacre in Jaffna and Rape of Muslims went unnoticed by many news outlets of the world including the Israeli connection in the Sri Lankan conflict.
Friday, April 27, 2007
Iran may be the greatest crisis of modern times
Iran may be the greatest crisis of modern times
John Pilger19 April 2007
John Pilger19 April 2007
The Israeli journalist Amira Hass describes the moment her mother, Hannah, was marched from a cattle train to the Nazi concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen. “They were sick and some were dying”, she says. “Then my mother saw these German women looking at the prisoners, just looking. This image became very formative in my upbringing, this despicable ‘looking from the side’.”
It is time we in Britain and other Western countries stopped looking from the side. We are being led towards perhaps the most serious crisis in modern history as the Bush-Cheney-Blair “long war” edges closer to Iran for no reason other than that nation’s independence from the rapacious US. The safe delivery of the 15 British sailors into the hands of Rupert Murdoch and his rivals (with tales of their “ordeal” almost certainly authored by the Ministry of Defence until it got the wind up) is both a farce and a distraction.
The Bush administration, in secret connivance with British PM Tony Blair, has spent four years preparing for “Operation Iranian Freedom”. Forty-five cruise missiles are primed to strike. According to Russia’s leading strategic thinker General Leonid Ivashov: “Nuclear facilities will be secondary targets … at least 20 such facilities need to be destroyed. Combat nuclear weapons may be used. This will result in the radioactive contamination of all the Iranian territory, and beyond.” And yet there is a surreal silence, save for the noise of “news” in which our powerful broadcasters gesture cryptically at the obvious but dare not make sense of it, lest the one-way moral screen erected between us and the consequences of an imperial foreign policy collapse and the truth be revealed. John Bolton, formerly Bush’s man at the United Nations, recently spelled out the truth: that the Bush-Cheney-Blair plan for the Middle East is an agenda to maintain division and instability.
In other words, bloodshed and chaos equals control. He was referring to Iraq, but he also meant Iran. One million Iraqis fill the streets of Najaf demanding that Bush and Blair get out of their homeland — that is the real news, not our nabbed sailor-spies, nor the political danse macabre of the pretenders to Blair’s Duce delusions. Whether it is treasurer Gordon Brown, the paymaster of the Iraq bloodbath, or John Reid, who sent British troops to pointless deaths in Afghanistan, or any of the others who sat through cabinet meetings knowing that Blair and his acolytes were lying through their teeth, only mutual distrust separates them now. They knew about Blair’s plotting with Bush. They knew about the fake 45-minute “warning”. They knew about the fitting up of Iran as the next “enemy”. Declared Brown to the Daily Mail: “The days of Britain having to apologise for its colonial history are over.
We should celebrate much of our past rather than apologise for it.” In Late Victorian Holocausts, the historian Mike Davis documents that as many as 21 million Indians died unnecessarily in famines criminally imposed by British colonial policies. Moreover, since the formal demise of that glorious imperium, declassified files make it clear that British governments have borne “significant responsibility” for the direct or indirect deaths of between 8.6 million and 13.5 million people throughout the world from military interventions and at the hands of regimes strongly supported by Britain.
The historian Mark Curtis calls these victims “unpeople”. “Rejoice!” said Margaret Thatcher. “Celebrate!” says Brown. Spot the difference. Brown is no different from Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and the other warmongering Democrats he admires and who support an unprovoked attack on Iran and the subjugation of the Middle East to “our interests” — and Israel’s, of course. Nothing has changed since the US and Britain destroyed Iran’s democratic government in 1953 and installed Reza Shah Pahlavi, whose regime, according to Amnesty International, had “the highest rate of death penalties in the world, no valid system of civilian courts and a history of torture” that was “beyond belief”.
Blair’s ruthlessness Look behind the one-way moral screen and you will distinguish the Blairite elite by its loathing of the humane principles that mark a real democracy. They used to be discreet about this, but no more. Two examples spring to mind. In 2004, Blair used the secretive “royal prerogative” to overturn a high court judgment that had restored the very principle of human rights set out in Magna Carta to the people of the Chagos Islands, a British colony in the Indian Ocean.
There was no debate. As ruthless as any dictator, Blair dealt his coup de grace with the lawless expulsion of the islanders from their homeland, now a US military base, from which Bush has bombed Iraq and Afghanistan and will bomb Iran. In the second example, only the degree of suffering is different. Last October, the Lancet published research by the Johns Hopkins University in the US and al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, which calculated that 655,000 Iraqis had died as a direct result of the Anglo-American invasion. Downing Street officials derided the study as “flawed”. They were lying. They knew that the chief scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defence, Sir Roy Anderson, had backed the survey, describing its methods as “robust” and “close to best practice”, and other government officials had secretly approved the “tried and tested way of measuring mortality in conflict zones”.
The figure for Iraqi deaths is now estimated at close to a million — carnage equivalent to that caused by the Anglo-American economic siege of Iraq in the 1990s, which produced the deaths of half a million infants under the age of five, verified by UNICEF. That, too, was dismissed contemptuously by Blair. “This Labour government, which includes Gordon Brown as much as it does Tony Blair”, wrote Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, “is party to a war crime of monstrous proportions. Yet our political consensus prevents any judicial or civil society response. Britain is paralysed by its own indifference.” Such is the scale of the crime and of our “looking from the side”. According to the Observer of April 8, the voters’ “damning verdict” on the Blair regime is expressed by a majority who have “lost faith” in their government. No surprise there.
Polls have long shown a widespread revulsion to Blair, demonstrated at the last general election, which produced the second-lowest turnout since the franchise. No mention was made of the Observer’s own contribution to this national loss of faith. Once celebrated as a bastion of liberalism that stood against Anthony Eden’s lawless attack on Egypt in 1956, the new right-wing, lifestyle Observer enthusiastically backed Blair’s lawless attack on Iraq, having helped lay the ground with major articles falsely linking Iraq with the 9/11 attacks — claims now regarded even by the Pentagon as fake. As hysteria is again fabricated, for Iraq, read Iran.
According to the former US treasury secretary Paul O’Neill, the Bush cabal decided to attack Iraq on “day one” of Bush’s administration, long before September 11, 2001.
The main reason was oil. O’Neill was shown a Pentagon document entitled “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts”, which outlined the carve-up of Iraq’s oil wealth among the major Anglo-American companies. Under a law written by US and British officials, the Iraqi puppet regime is about to hand over the extraction of the largest concentration of oil on Earth to Anglo-American companies. Piracy Nothing like this piracy has happened before in the modern Middle East, where OPEC (Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries) has ensured that oil business is conducted between states. Across the Shatt al-Arab waterway is another prize: Iran’s vast oilfields. Just as non-existent weapons of mass destruction or facile concerns for democracy had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq, so non-existent nuclear weapons have nothing to do with the coming US onslaught on Iran. Unlike Israel and the US, Iran has abided by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, of which it was an original signatory, and has allowed routine inspections under its legal obligations.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has never cited Iran for diverting its civilian program to military use. For the past three years, IAEA inspectors have said they have been allowed to “go anywhere” inside Iran. The recent UN Security Council sanctions against Iran are the result of Washington’s bribery. Until recently, the British were unaware that their government was one of the world’s most consistent abusers of human rights and backers of state terrorism.
Few Britons knew that the Muslim Brotherhood, the forerunner of al Qaeda, was sponsored by British intelligence as a means of systematically destroying secular Arab nationalism, or that MI6 recruited young British Muslims in the 1980s as part of a US$4 billion Anglo-American-backed jihad against the Soviet Union known as “Operation Cyclone”.
In 2001, few Britons knew that 3000 innocent Afghan civilians were bombed to death as revenge for the attacks of September 11. No Afghans brought down the twin towers. Thanks to Bush and Blair, awareness in Britain and all over the world has risen as never before. When home-grown terrorists struck London in July 2005, few doubted that the attack on Iraq had provoked the atrocity and that the bombs that killed 52 Londoners were, in effect, Blair’s bombs. In my experience, most people do not indulge the absurdity and cruelty of the “rules” of rampant power. They do not contort their morality and intellect to comply with double standards and the notion of approved evil, of worthy and unworthy victims. They would, if they knew, grieve for all the lives, families, careers, hopes and dreams destroyed by Blair and Bush.
The sure evidence is the British public’s wholehearted response to the 2004 tsunami, shaming that of the government. Certainly, they would agree wholeheartedly with Robert H. Jackson, chief of counsel for the United States at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi leaders at the end of the Second World War. “Crimes are crimes”, he said, “whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct which we would not be willing to have invoked against us”.
As with Henry Kissinger and Donald Rumsfeld, who dare not travel to certain countries for fear of being prosecuted as war criminals, Blair as a private citizen may no longer be untouchable. On March 20, Baltasar Garzon, the tenacious Spanish judge who pursued Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, called for indictments against those responsible for “one of the most sordid and unjustifiable episodes in recent human history” — Iraq. Five days later, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, to which Britain is a signatory, said that Blair could one day face war-crimes charges. These are critical changes in the way the sane world thinks — again, thanks to the Reich of Blair and Bush.
However, we live in the most dangerous of times. On April 6, Blair accused “elements of the Iranian regime” of “backing, financing, arming and supporting terrorism in Iraq”. He offered no evidence, and the Ministry of Defence has none. This is the same Goebbels-like refrain with which he and his coterie, Gordon Brown included, brought an epic bloodletting to Iraq. How long will the rest of us continue looking from the side?
[Reprinted from
From: International News, Green Left Weekly issue #707 25 April 2007.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)